Publications

(forthcoming) Robichaud. P. On Culpable Ignorance and akrasia. Ethics.

(forthcoming) Robichaud, P. Moral Capacity Enhancement Does Not Entail Moral Worth Enhancement. American Journal of Bioethics.

(forthcoming) Kennett, J., Vincent, N A  & Snoek, A. Drug Addiction and Criminal Responsibility, in N Levy & J Clausen (eds) Handbook on Neuroethics, Springer, The Netherlands.

(forthcoming)  Goold, I. & Maslen, H. Responsibility Enhancement and the Law of Negligence, in N Levy & J Clausen (eds) Handbook on Neuroethics, Springer, The Netherlands.

(forthcoming) Goold, I. Property or Not Property? The Spectrum of Approaches to Regulating the Use of Human Bodily Material. Journal of Law and Medicine

(forthcoming) Goold, I. Why Does It Matter How We Regulate the Use of Human Body Parts?. Journal of Medical Ethics

(forthcoming) Goold, I. Abandonment and Human Tissue in Goold, I, Herring,J, Skene, L & Greasley, K (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Hart Publishing, Oxford)

(forthcoming) Quigley, M & I, Goold. Human Biomaterials: The Case for a Property Approach in Goold, I, Herring,J, Skene, L & Greasley, K (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Hart Publishing, Oxford)

(forthcoming) Santoni de Sio F, Robichaud P, and Vincent N A. Who should enhance? Conceptual and normative dimensions of cognitive enhancement, Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies.

(2014) Goold, I. & Maslen, H. Must the Surgeon Take the Pill? Negligence and Duty in the Context of Cognitive EnhancementModern Law Review.

(2014) Vincent N A. Restoring Responsibility: promoting justice, therapy and reform through direct brain interventions, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 8(1):21-42.

(2014) Vincent N A. Neurolaw and Direct Brain Interventions, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 8(1):43-50.

(2013) Santoni de Sio F & Vincent N A. Rationality + Consciousness = Free Will by David Hodgson, Criminal Law and Philosophy. DOI: 10.1007/s11572-013-9282-1

(2013) Faulmüller, N., Maslen, H., & Santoni de Sio, F. The Indirect Psychological Costs of Cognitive Enhancement. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13, 45-47.

(2013) Santoni de Sio, F. & Jespersen, B. Function, Roles, and Human Capacity, Methode: Analytic Perspectives, 2:2, 58-66.

(2013)  Santoni de Sio F. & Jespersen B.  La teoria istituzionalistica della capacità, in M. De Caro, A. Lavazza, G. Sartori (eds.). Quanto siamo responsabili? Filosofia, neuroscienze e società, Codice Edizioni, Torino (in Italian).

(2013) Santoni de Sio, F., Basic Responsibility and Cultural Differences, Ragion Pratica, 40:1, 49-70 (in Italian)

(2013) Vincent, N.A. Enhancing Responsibility, in Vincent (ed). Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA. ISBN 978-01-999-2560-5.(2013) Vincent N A Introduction, in N A Vincent (ed) Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA. ISBN 978-01-999-2560-5.

(2013) Vincent N A. A Compatibilist Theory of Legal Responsibility, Criminal Law and Philosophy. DOI: 10.1007/s11572-013-9249-2.

(2013) Vincent N A. Blame, Desert and Compatibilist Capacity: a diachronic account of moderateness in regards to reasons-responsiveness, Philosophical Explorations, 16(2):178-194. DOI: 10.1080/13869795.2013.787443.

(2013) Vincent N A. Strafrechtelijke verantwoordelijkheid en de neurowetenschappen (Criminal responsibility and neuroscience), Justitiële Verkenningen (Judicial Explorations journal), Research Centre of the Dutch Ministry of Security & Justice (WODC), 39(1):65-77.

(2013) Goold I. The Concise Argument: Withholding Artificial Nutrition and Hydration. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39: 541

(2013) Santoni de Sio, F. & Vincent, N.A. Rationality + Consciousness = Free Will by David Hodgson, Criminal Law and Philosophy.

(2012) Goold I. The Concise Argument: Highlights from this issue. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38: 133

(2012) Santoni de Sio, F., Maslen, H., & Faulmüller, N. The Necessity of Objective Standards for Moral Enhancement. The American Journal of Bioethics-Neuroscience, 3, 15-16.

(2012) Santoni de Sio, F., An Aristotelian View of Responsibility: John Gardner, Oxford Philosophy, and the Criminal Law, Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, 42:2, 357-378 (in Italian)

(2012) Santoni de Sio, F., The Free Will Worth Wanting: Daniel Dennett and Contemporary Compatibilism, Rivista di Filosofia, 103:1, 123-144 (in Italian)

(2012) Vincent N A. The Importance of Monitoring in the Adoption of More Liberal Drug Policies, AJOB Neuroscience, 3(2):30-1.

(2011) Vincent N A. A Structured Taxonomy of Responsibility Concepts, in N Vincent, I van de Poel & J van den Hoven (eds) Moral Responsibility: beyond free will & determinism, Springer, pp 15-35. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1878-4_2.

(2011) Vincent N A & van de Poel, I. Introduction, in N Vincent, I van de Poel & J van den Hoven (eds) Moral Responsibility: beyond free will & determinism, Springer, pp 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1878-4_1.

(2011) Vincent N A. The Challenges Posed to Private Law by Emerging Cognitive Enhancement Technologies, in S Muller, S Zouridis, M Frishman and L Kistemaker (eds) The Law of the Future and The Future of Law, Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, Oslo, pp 511-21.

(2011) Vincent N A. Madness, Badness, and Neuroimaging-Based Responsibility Assessments, in M Freeman (ed) Law and Neuroscience, Current Legal Issues (Vol 13), OUP, pp 79-95.

(2011) Vincent N A. Legal responsibility adjudication and the normative authority of the mind sciences, Philosophical Explorations, 14(3):315-31.

(2011) Vincent N A, P Haselager & G-J Lokhorst. The Neuroscience of Responsibility — Workshop Report, Neuroethics, 4(2):175-8. Published online 16 June 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s12152-010-9078-0.

(2011) Vincent N A. Neuroimaging and Responsibility Assessments, Neuroethics, 4(1):35-49. Published online 21 January 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s12152-008-9030-8.

(2011) Vincent N A. Capacitarianism, responsibility and restored mental capacities, Proceedings of the conference Technologies on the stand: Legal and ethical questions in neuroscience and robotics, Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, pp 41-62. April 2011, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

(2011) Vincent N A, W Hall & J Kennett. Report on Neurolaw in Australia workshop, hosted at Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia on 14-15 July 2011, co-funded by the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia.

BOOKS

(forthcoming) I Goold, Herring,J, Skene, L and Greasley, K (eds), Persons, Parts and Property: How Should We Regulate Human Tissue in the 21st Century? (Hart Publishing, Oxford)

Vincent N A (ed) (2013) Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA. ISBN 978-01-999-2560-5.

Santoni de Sio, F. (2013). Per colpa di chi. Mente, responsabilità e diritto, Raffaello Cortina, Milano (Who Is To Blame. Mind, Responsibility, and Law, in Italian). ISBN 978-88-6030-581-7

Vincent N A, I van de Poel & J van den Hoven (eds) (2011) Moral Responsibility: beyond free will & determinism, Dordrecht, NL, Springer. In Springer’s series “Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy”. ISBN 978-94-007-1877-7.

.

Under review / In preparation

Maslen, H., Santoni de Sio, F., & Faulmüller, N. (under review). With Cognitive Enhancement Comes Great Responsibility?, in I. Oosterlaken et al. (eds.), Responsible Innovation, Springer, Dordrecht.

Santoni de Sio, F. & Jespersen, B. (under review). Capacity as a Normative Power.

Maslen, H., Faulmüller, N., & Savulescu, J. (in preparation). Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement – A Normative Perspective.

Santoni de Sio, F., Vincent, N.A, Faulmüller, N. (in preparation). Beyond cheating, responsibility-shifting, and authenticity: Why less praise for enhanced agents.

Schelle, K., Faulmüller, N., Caviola, L., & Hewstone, M. (in preparation). Attitudes Towards Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement – A Review.